596
9
property at $40,000 and considered himself
fully entitled to be paid that sum, as
being
more
not
"
than the full
and fair compensation
expreped in the proviso of his lease for
#
resumption.
10.
Nevertheless he added that, as one of his valucitors had named the sum of
$35.000 as the value of the property it that
time he believed he "Could not fairly insist
on a
M.
higher compensation" qe qe qe
I certainly
drew no other inference
from the above language than that M2
Duddell was reluctant to sell at all, and that although he would have liked to
reject any
he was
lower valuation than $40,0
any
prepared actually to "resist lower valuation than $35,000, by bringing
the
case
ао
تلف
might
have been arranged
for him to do, before the Supreme bount
the ground that the fuweyor Queral bound under the leave to
#
#
was
give full and fai compensation and had not done so. 12 I well knew that, if it
came
question of evidence to be weighed by
might
to
a
fury, the Government", beforehand be almost
certain of a verdict
Moreover,
on
a
against the brown, and
I felt
reluctant to tatte
very
any
Man's property from him
aguind
such
а
strong protest
Encloome 313. 18th tfil /bt
reply
مار
Duddell..
us that received from M
Accordingly I directed a
be sent to Mo Lapraik informing him that Iwas advised the sum already offered
was
C
for above the selling vilure of
($32,500)
No comments yet.
Private notes are available after approval.